is drupal good
home Uncategorized is drupal good

is drupal good

I just keep running into showstoppers like RULES, and THEMING. I believe we could hide some of the complexity and have a Drupal 8 that still works for the likes of me. Except that Drupal 7 would inevitably come out that competition worse off. I have spent almost 150 hours of tutorials from places like trying to figure out how to upgrade their infrastructure and stay within the Drupal ecosystem. That is, you have one codebase, maybe even on one server, and you can run many Drupal websites (each with its own database, set of modules, unique files directory, theme, etc.). You can find plenty of arguments out there about how terrible Drupal is — that’s easy — but it’s not true. I admit that I am guilty of running two Drupal 7 sites with a very large amount of custom code. And menus used to be defined in a hook, but now there are sometimes multiple new YAML files you have to add to a module to get Drupal's menu system to pick up a new menu item—and you have to know how to wire up a menu item to a route, and what a route is, etc. So you could built 10 same websites which share modules, but also option to host them either on the same server, or different. Nobody likes popups, so we waited until now to recommend our newsletter, a curated periodical featuring thoughts, opinions, and tools for building a better digital world. Right now however, I'm being forced to use the abomination that is Wordpress to build my latest project, and I hate it. Yes, yes, there are a thousand other arguments against multisite... but the fact is, there are a number of organizations—usually some of the orgs with hundreds or thousands of the sites that show up in the Drupal project usage statistics—who are holding off upgrading to Drupal 8 because multisite is harder, and the future of multisite is still fuzzy. (Again, the best way to compete with them is to become better at what it's already good at, not trying to change its nature to more resemble them, because that's how you pick up their weaknesses along with their strengths.) Open-source; Anyone can install and use Drupal without any costs. In fact, I still have not had time to work on writing a module migration for Honeypot for Drupal 8, even though I had a fully working and tested upgrade path using the old update.php method years ago. (I remember pointing out how immature D8's media handling was about five years ago, and getting pushback... but then seeing people several years later admitting how immature D8's media handling still was...). We won’t deny that Drupal is complex, especially compared to WordPress, but it’s because of that complexity that it has a lot of advanced functionality as well. He understood both the front end and backend needs. I keep reading how Composer is the future this, how GIT is the future that, etc., etc. Amazing stuff can be built today using API back-ends and superior JS frameworks on client side (or some static site generators). In fact, I would argue that the use of Composer made that even better. In reply to Drupal 8 adoption has tanked by Some Guy. However, the site you're reading right now (assuming I haven't yet upgraded it to something else) is actually a multisite—I run six different Drupal 7 sites off one codebase, and there's no way I could've justified building each of these sites in Drupal at all if I wasn't able to build one build pipeline, one production server, and one development workflow that literally does all six sites. With the help of some extensions, you can create stunning multimedia content that … In the current culture many module maintainers decline to commit very necessary patches for want of test coverage, which is preventing essential features and modules getting stable releases. Test coverage is a theological doctrine imbibed by people who learned C++ or Java at university. Truth be told, many of them would be best advised to migrate to Wordpress as it's less expensive to develop and maintain and provides a simpler admin experience out of the box. Five (5) years ago, back in 2014:…. Terms : 3) It's all about the programmer. I’d love to continue the discussion further, so hit me up in the comments. Stop trying to compete with different technologies, and just try to be the best at being what you already are! Instead it's driving them away. Drupal alienated thousands of site-builders and developers and put many out of business. It’s worth noting that Drupal didn’t invent modules, nor is it the only platform that has a concept like modules. Drupal isn’t bad, Drupal is good. Here's a memo to anyone in favor of those things: the whole point of a system like Drupal is to make doing things, easier. There are just so many pieces to organize. Drupal is the #1 platform for web content management among global enterprises, governments, higher education institutions, and NGOs. Distributed under General Public License (GNU), Drupal is nothing but an open source content management framework. In any case, the new architecture has more complexity than the old; and because of this, it's almost a necessity to adopt the following: Along with all the other changes, Drupal's theme system was completely swapped out—it went from using the unholy monster that was PHPTemplate to a clean, new, standard system from Symfony, Twig. Drupal has pretty good caching (though obviously it's not making things easy for Bradley!) All custom modules have each own git repo, and we are using Satis (much faster than adding git repos to composer.json) to manage them as composer packages separately. The experience of managing a Drupal site is frustrating. 1. Try to think a bit more out of the box. If you remove all of that stuff, you get CMS which will use masses for small sites, easy install, make few pages and that is that? The modules are already broken and non-functional in many cases, how could they get worse by actually applying some patch to the shipping version sooner rather than later? Except when it just doesn't. Drupal has a way of making things that should be trivially easy into nightmares that waste huge amounts of time, millions and millions of dollars worth of time across the industry, things that are NECESSARY to get a site launched, and hence, unavoidable. Oh yeah, Drupal 8 sure is great, unless you want to have some obscure features like *checks notes* adding a menu link in just one language, then you have to patch entire core, cause every contrib module that fixes that breaks everything else. (Please RT.). You can only make things right by ackowledging what needs to be made right. Jeff's excellent post and many excellent comments here (and elsewhere) tells us that most of us Drupal 'old hands' have mixed, even confused, feelings. They are a kind, funny, inclusive, and determined bunch. We hope this will be one of a number of initiatives to fix this issue and keep those 800k businesses on Drupal, which in turn will keep the platform and its community healthy and growing. We are pretty late here btw. With D8 and Composer, you can write modules in separate git repos and pulling them with a composer. Reported in November 2011, first patch was submitted in January 2014, still not fixed. Here's the rub: Multisite architecture is kind of in conflict with some of the core ways Composer works. #2564307 [meta] Remaining Drupal 8 PostgreSQL issues On the current project, we are doing that. Integrate some sort of linting framework lest you hit deprecated code and weird syntax issues. I wouldn’t have a career as a developer without Drupal, but I wouldn’t recommend Drupal. Instead, it was half baked with the standards through minor updates. Just adding CSS or a font to a theme and expecting it to be loaded, or trying to figure out which template file might override some html output, has become a nightmare. Cui bono? Until Core is updated automatically via "composer update" it takes many wasted hours to update sites, especially when plugins and the core itself have bugs that give the unhelpful "website has encountered a problem" message. We have come up with reasons to go off-the-shelf or to go custom-built. In the context of modular core, only include in vendor/ folder the required items, and anyway thin out vendor/ as far as possible. On the front-end, there is very little D8 brings to the table that is better than D7 and the D8 ecosystem is nowhere near prime-time to be considered as powerful or usable as D7. I've spilled enough ink on these pages over the years over Composer and Drupal 8 (2019, 2018, 2018-2, 2017, 2017-2, 2017-3, etc. Anyone saying to use the command line or get out of the admin interface and into an IDE is going down the wrong path (unless, perhaps, it an entirely decoupled theming layer). to make a new Drupal 8 site that the client expects within a few months. Very interesting article. While Drupal themes do exist, most Drupal websites sport a custom-coded theme, or at least a highly customized theme. ‘We have been working with Drupal 8 since beginning of 2016. It is free to be used by any blogger or developer. Drupal helps you create dynamic, content-driven websites. (source: From Drupal 6 to Drupal 7 to Drupal 8 the admin interface has remained mostly, and disappointingly, the same. For those just looking for a tool to facilitate the expression of their thoughts, it's a big middle-finger. On D7 multisite mostly understand the same codebase, different DB and all hosted on the same server. Every language or system has its quirks but Drupal is defined by them. Keep politics out of the overall equation. But I think the usage pattern and value proposition for Drupal has changed. But let me say this. But at least with Drupal 5 to 6 or 6 to 7, that was a choice, and you could upgrade the underlying system without also upgrading the theme. Since you can't disable a module anymore, and it was so bad that it hosed the uninstall, I ended up having to resort to deleting tables in the DB just to get the site working again. Improved debugging. Drush - it is a Drupal thing from ages (Console is just making more tied to Drupal core). But thus far Drupal 8 is a nightmare to manage. At a certain very high budget level D8 probably does give better value than D8. If Drupal is ever the best solution for your project we will tell you, because we will want to use it. But for more complex modules that are not in core, like Rules, XML Sitemaps, Google Analytics, etc., there are a ton of configuration options, and without a reliable configuration upgrade path, site owners literally have to re-do all the original configuration work they did when they built out their current Drupal site. annotations are PHP things (which, they took from Java and C#).

How To Format And Install Windows 10 In Hp Laptop, 260 Audubon Ave, How Old Is Andrews Glacier, Steep And Cheap Carhartt, Busan Metro Map 2020, Safest Areas In West Palm Beach, Black Pepper In Nepali Translation,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *